ALTERNATIVE LAW’S ADR Dispute Resolution Systems actively collaborate with legal departments and law firms to settle disputes at any stage of the legal process. We design multiple options for effective strategic assistance for dispute resolution, inside or outside of a courtroom. Learn more about our mediation attorney and mediation lawyer services.
Mediation Attorney & Mediation Lawyer Results
Our company is about satisfaction and results: results for you, results for your client, and results for your firm.
We are an exclusive ADR, Alternative Dispute Resolution firm. Our mediators do not compete for your clients. We are neutral. We will not do litigation. The other distinguishing characteristic about our firm is our satisfaction guarantee. We eliminate all uncertainty for you. Our goal is to ensure your complete satisfaction with our firm’s services. If you are not completely satisfied, we offer the industry’s leading safety net – a money back guarantee.
- MULTIPLE MEDIATION PROCESSES
- BEST IDEAS WIN MEDIATION
- FACILITATIVE MEDIATION
- TRANSFORMATIVE MEDIATION
- EVALUATIVE MEDIATION
- NEUTRAL EVALUATION
- SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
- DIRECT AND INDIRECT NEGOTIATION
- WINNER-TAKE-ALL NEGOTIATION
- MINI-TRIAL
- SUMMARY JURY TRIAL
- NEUTRAL EXPERT FACT-FINDING
- COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL MASTERS/DISCOVERY MASTERS
- PRIVATE JUDGING PROCESSES
- ARBITRATION
- HIGH-LOW ARBITRATION
- FINAL OFFER ARBITRATION
- MEDIATION-ARBITRATION (MED-ARB)
- LITIGATION
- ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION SYTEMS DESIGN
- PREVENTION PLANNING
At ALTERNATIVE LAW, expert and professional neutrals (mediators, arbitrators, professors, and attorneys) actively assist clients. They utilize a full range of the latest, most advanced, and most tested dispute resolution processes, spanning from direct negotiation to litigation, to achieve resolution.
THE ALTERNATIVE LAW ADR SYSTEMS
MEDIATION PROCESSES
In Mediation Processes, a third party neutral works to facilitate a negotiated settlement between the parties. The mediator facilitates the negotiations and evaluates the relative merits of the claims and defenses. The neutral does not have power to impose a solution or decision — the parties retain ultimate control over the outcome. The terms of the agreement are limited only by the interests and creativity of the parties and the neutral. By the agreement and permission of the parties, the neutral sets the ground rules and may seriously affect the order of the proceedings, the parties’ collective and individual analyses, and the general dynamic of the settlement discussion.
BEST IDEAS WIN MEDIATION
BEST IDEAS WIN is a mediation process developed by our Alternative Law Mediation Results program. It is a very interactive and participatory process designed to promote a fair and just result for both sides. It requires active participation by the mediator. This helps the parties to formulate a resolution. This process succeeds in difficult cases and has proven effective with Fortune 500 companies, the United States Government, non-profits, divorce cases, and plaintiff and defendants’ counsel all across America.
FACILITATIVE MEDIATION
Facilitative Mediation is a process in which outcome control remains almost entirely in the hands of the parties and counsel. The mediator restores communication and helps to create options for resolution by:
- We will ensure the exchange of all relevant information and guarantee that the parties will be heard
- Providing parties the ability to vent
- Coaching negotiators on next moves
- Helping parties invent settlement options
- Transmitting offers and demands
- Working to overcome potential impasses
EVALUATIVE MEDIATION
Evaluative mediation occurs after the mediator creates more structure. They use it for more difficult cases, where the gap between the parties is large, the issues complex and the stakes high. The mediator allows the parties to test the reality of their predicted outcomes by:
- Working to thoroughly understand the parties’ factual and legal arguments
- Providing feedback on the relative merits of claims and defenses
- Offering his or her prediction of the outcome in court
- In some circumstances, recommending settlement ranges
NEUTRAL EVALUATION
Neutral evaluation is a non-binding process in which the parties retain a neutral to provide an evaluation based solely on the merits of the case. The neutral:
- Reviews the factual and legal positions of the parties either through briefs/ oral arguments
- Evaluates what the likely jury outcome might be
- Provides his or her view of the likely/fair results
- Is not retained to facilitate the parties negotiations
DIRECT NEGOTIATION
The parties collectively retain complete formal and informal control over the process and its outcome including:
- The ground rules and the agenda
- The selection of the neutral
- The place and timing of the negotiation
- Use of their own negotiation styles and strategies
- When and how they communicate, listen and convey reactions
- Whether to obtain outside information, comment,or feedback and if so, whether to introduce it
- The decision to end the process at any time
- The ability to discuss, agree upon issues. Then, on solutions that need not qually relate directly to the subject matter of the dispute.
The acceptance of an outcome mutually agreed upon
INDIRECT NEGOTIATION
All offers are pass through to the neutral. Furthermore, the parties certainly do not have to altogether engage in meetings or direct contact.
LITIGATION
The parties have minimal control over process or outcome. The court retains ultimate authority, interpreting and applying the rules of civil litigation. The court sets discovery deadlines, conference dates and trial dates. The neutral decision-maker will be determined by the court. The rules of trial practice and evidence in the presentation of the case must be followed. Parties get bound to the facts found and decisions are made by judge and jury, subject to limited right of appeal. Only narrow forms of remedies are available — an award of money damages or limited injunctive relief.
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
Settlement conference is a simple, evaluative mediation frequently used in uncomplicated cases, where the parties are often not present and the neutral is an expert mediator, arbitrator, professor, who reviews the cases with the parties and after a discussion of the facts and issues, suggests a settlement number or range.
MINI-TRIAL
Mini trial is a highly structured, formalized, and evaluative mediation process in which the parties cede a great deal of procedural control. This is to reframe the dispute from the context of litigation to the context of a business problem. It requires the participation of non-legal party representatives with settlement authority who sit as a panel with the neutral. The neutral advisor:
- Works closely with the parties but, before the hearing to facilitate agreement on procedure and resolve disputes
- Oversees the panel of senior business officers
- Moderates the mini-trial hearing and then provides an evaluation if necessary
- Facilitates settlement between the parties after rendering his or her evaluation
SUMMARY JURY TRIAL
A Summary Jury Trial is a highly structured, formal, and evaluative mediation process. In this process, a private “jury pool” assembles to hear the case, and a neutral advisor sets up and presides over the proceedings.
Then, the advisor oversees a mediation/negotiation period after the procedure. This ultimately facilitates an agreement on settlement terms.
NON-BINDING ARBITRATION
Non-binding arbitration is a hearing process that looks and feels like arbitration. But, is advisory, not binding. The neutral advisor(s):
- Coordinates, sets up and presides over the process
- Reviews the factual and legal positions of the parties through briefs or oral arguments
- Evaluates what the likely arbitration outcome might be
NEUTRAL EXPERT FACT-FINDING
Neutral expert fact-finding can be a stand-alone, non-binding process, or it can be part of a larger non-binding process. They actively use it to resolve a dispute of technical issue.
The neutral:
- Finds facts and provides analysis after hearing presentations by the parties, and their experts
- Acts as a substitute for partisan experts
- Can conduct an independent investigation into the technical facts and issues.
COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL MASTERS/DISCOVERY MASTERS
Court Appointed Special Masters/Discovery Masters will actively be appointed by sitting judges to assist with disputes that are legally or administratively complex. After that, discovery masters are selected.
The Special Master or Discovery Master: Assists in designing case settlement options
- May mediate the cases or groups of cases for mass torts
- Mediates discovery disputes
- Rule on discovery issues that can’t be resolved at the time.
ADJUDICATIVE PROCESSES
In Adjudicative Processes, a third party neutral hears and considers facts and/or arguments presented by the plaintiff and defendant, and to render a reasoned binding decision or solution based upon an agreed upon standard of legality or fairness. The neutral’s role is to issue a solution for the parties, not to help them reach an agreed-upon solution to their dispute.
ARBITRATION
Arbitration, long used as an alternative to litigation in commercial disputes and labor disputes, offers less formal procedures, abbreviated presentations and the undivided attention of the neutral(s). The arbitrator(s):
- rules on discovery requests and disputes
- determines whether to apply rules of evidence and to what degree
- hears expert witnesses and cross examinations
- reviews briefs, documents and other exhibits
- entertains argument. This happens later, by counsel before rendering a decision
- administers arbitration according to the JAMS Rules and Procedures for Arbitrations
HIGH LOW ARBITRATION
High-low arbitration, is also known as bracketed arbitrationand occurs when the parties structure an agreement to “bracket” or limit the possible range of outcomes. The parties agree that the arbitrator decides only the issue of liability with predetermined sums. The defendant or plaintiff will pay them accordingly.
- Moreover, it delivers a verdict on liability and damages. This is while the parties agree in advance on minimum and maximum payment sums.
- Is not told the high low range, in effect will create “blind high low” arbitration
FINAL OFFER ARBITRATION
Furthermore, final offer arbitration, commonly used in the sport of “baseball,” occurs when the plaintiff and the defendant each submit a “final offer” to the arbitrator. The arbitrator chooses an appropriate settlement between the offer or the demand presented based upon the settlement heard.
PRIVATE JUDGING
Private judging a private trial will get conducted by an expert is most similar to a conventional trial in that judgment could be appealed for errors of law, or as against the weight of the evidence.
Basically, the neutral gets selected by the parties, rather often because they are experts in highly complex or technical issues
- Ask to try the issues in a case and to make findings of law or fact
- Enters a decision as a judgment which will become a matter of public record
- Offers parties the flexibility to exert some control over the timing of the resolution of their dispute
MED-ARB
Med-Arb offers parties the ability to participate in a mediation having agreed in advance that if unable to reach a settlement, the process will shift to an arbitration. The neutral:
- Will serve as both mediator and arbitrator in an “integrated” process, acting to facilitate negotiations and also making binding decisions on stalemated issues along the way
- Also, will attempt to achieve a mediated settlement before changing roles” to decide any unresolved issues in a “separate” process
- Acts as either the mediator or the arbitrator but not both in a Med-Arb Opt-Out
Makes a binding settlement decision between the final offer or final demand given in a Final
OFFER MED/ARB
Additionally, this will occurs when each party finally makes an offer. The arbitrator decides which one to take.
ADR | Best Ideas Win | Business Consulting | Clients | Training | Locations | Mediation | CONTACT US